Jiu Jitsu (2020) - Review

Jiu Jitsu is a science fiction martial arts movie starring Alain Moussi as Jake Barnes a member of a paramilitary group that was formed to combat an extraterrestrial in ritualistic jiu jitsu combat. Starring alongside Moussi are familiar names such as Frank Grillo, Nicolas Cage and Tony Jaa. Some lower profile actors starring in this movie are JuJu Chan, Marie Avgeropoulos, and Eddie Steeples. 

I would be a liar if I told you I was looking forward to writing about this movie. I watched it late last year or earlier this year after my wife found it in a Redbox locally, and it broke my heart to watch the movie and stomp on the heartfelt sentiment of her supporting my Nic Cage completionist streak. The movie starts with Jake being assaulted by an unknown force and obtaining amnesia after jumping off of a cliff and hitting his head on rocks below the water surface. The exposition of the movie flows from this point, as after being reunited with his previous crew, it is learned that Jake was the one who came up with the plan to defeat the alien in combat, but has to be reintroduced to every facet of the previously established plan for his, no, our benefit. Each member in Jake's group is an experienced martial artist, which shows in the choreography throughout the entire movie. Indeed, the fight choreography happens to be the defining characteristic of what is good for the entire runtime. Despite having a multi-million dollar budget, the shortcuts that are made to make sure that the project became a finished product are glaringly obvious: there are filming sequences that are done early in the movie that are done from a first-person perspective. Great. That would be fine if it weren't for the fact that the filming for this scene is internally inconsistent; Jake is being escorted by Jaa's character out of a military installation where he has been held prisoner after recovering from his initial combat encounter at the beginning of the movie. Again, this would be fine if at one point Moussi didn't deliberately put down the camera that he has been carrying for the alternative perspective and fights several soldiers before coming back to the camera and picking it up, continuing the first-person perspective escape. Another glaring style choice is the use of comic book panel transitions to move between acts. The way in which they are used points to an uncertainty in the technical know-how to transition from one scene to another. The script could be a possible root cause of this problem. The writer may have been able to plan all the movie's setpieces, but lacked the foresight to allow scenes to go from Point A to Point B.

That's really more than what I wanted to say about this movie. I didn't have an outline to follow when starting this review, so I allowed myself to get to this point by happenstance. I even thought this was going to be more of a blog post than a review, much like what I did with Army of One. Before I end the review, I did want to comment on Cage's performance as the jiu jitsu master, Wiley. We learn that Wiley was the previous "chosen one" that the alien deemed fit for final combat, but failed six years prior. We meet him as the washed up chosen one, a familiar trope for Cage; I have reviewed a few movies so far where he has inhabited this role: Ghost Rider: Spirit of Vengeance and The Sorcerer's Apprentice. I would say that his performance in Jiu Jitsu is more reminiscent of Balthazar Blake in The Sorcerer's Apprentice than that of Ghost Rider, however. His character isn't this aloof idiot, but someone who is still capable of training those who are tasked with the completion of finishing the ritual combat conditions. Overall, I would not recommend this movie to anyone, not even to someone who enjoys the occasional bad movie - Jiu Jitsu is the Predator your mother promised that you had at home, and not even in any good way. However, if you are a glutton for punishment, as I have been in my quest to review the good and even the very bad Nic Cage movies, not even the opposite of a glowing recommendation will stop you from consuming this movie. 

Valley Girl (1983) - Review

Valley Girl is a comedy and romance movie starring Deborah Foreman and Nicolas Cage as the two leads. Deborah Foreman and Nicolas Cage portray high school students Julie and Randy in Los Angeles, although from two different worlds. Julie is the titular “Valley Girl” who is being romantically pursued by Randy, a punk from the heart of the city, after a chance encounter at a party in the Valley which Randy and his friend Fred (Cameron Dye) crashed. Julie’s life gets complicated as her friends and her ex-boyfriend, Tommy (Michael Bowen), are continually unsure about her sudden interest in Randy, as he is far too wild for the seemingly tame Valley-lifestyle. Besides her parents, everyone in her life tries to convince Julie to ditch Randy and come back to a relationship to her abusive ex, Tommy.

I really enjoy slice of live movies that capture the spirit of the times. I published a review over Fast Times at Ridgemont High fairly recently, and I think the object of comparison is fairly easy. The atmosphere is highly sexually charged, the music is representative of the time, and the portrayals of the lives of the high school aged characters feels genuine. In some sort of reversal, the movie focuses heavily on the female cast more so than the Cameron Crowe classic. But that is where the comparisons between the two really end. The movie is really strong as it shows the burgeoning romantic relationship between Julie and Randy, not by including protracted scenes of the two sharing dialogue to learn more about each other, but by showing their relationship grow through a montage. The chemistry between Foreman and Cage is very strong in this movie, and the direction of Martha Coolidge shows clearly in this section of the movie. Despite being corny with its very dated dialogue, I genuinely found several parts in this movie clever and very funny. Despite all of its strengths, the lack of a cohesive script really shows. There is one subplot, and the connection to the rest of the movie is very tenuous. One of Julie’s friends, Suzi (Michelle Meyrink), hosts a party early in the movie which many of her classmates attend. One classmate, Skip, becomes enchanted by Suzi’s stepmother, Beth (Lee Purcell), who tries her best to seduce the unsuspecting boy. This subplot of will they end up having a sexual relationship does very little to the rest of the story. This lack of connection to the rest of the story also is present in one particular scene in the movie where Julie dumps Randy and sends him into a spiral. As Randy is dumped and Julie goes back to her abusive ex-boyfriend, the scene when she makes Randy aware their relationship is logically set up by previous scenes, but the portrayal of this scene didn’t transfer the sense that this relationship was over. Did I perceive this scene from Randy’s viewpoint, where the event would be confusing? Were there breakdowns in the portrayals of the characters that I have come to know in the hour or so before? I’m not too sure which is true, or if there is another option. But I am sure that this very pivotal scene did not achieve what it was supposed to achieve in its mode of communication.

Valley Girl is very charming. I had this very low on my list because it is an early Cage movie, and I was anxious to see how well he performed early in his career. I’ve seen Fast Times, where he does not have much screen presence in the two to three scenes he does appear. I’ve seen Moonstruck and Raising Arizona, which are a couple of my favorite movies of all time, where Cage shows his vast range of portraying the human experience. After watching Valley Girl, my anxiety was quieted as Cage shows during many points where he has his fun and zany side come out trying to win Foreman’s Julie after his initial dumping, and he is able to show genuine joy and love toward Julie and showing her the world outside of her little bubble. I have a very limited audience that I can recommend this movie to; I would recommend this movie to anyone who can sit through brief moments of erotic coupling. Valley Girl is pretty thin and hardly a movie at times, but it ever so slightly catches the magic of the early 80s and the two cultures the two characters of Julie and Randy represent.

Humanity Bureau (2018) - Review

 Humanity Bureau is a sci-fi/thriller that stars Nicolas Cage as Noah Kross, a government worker in a post-second civil war America, who is tasked with evaluating the "efficiency" of certain individuals to determine if they deserve to remain in their communities or if they are to be relocated to a rehabilitation community referred to as "New Eden". After killing a former politician who was violently resisting the relocation to New Eden, Kross is tasked with evaluating a mother and child, Rachel and Lucas (Sarah Lind & Jakob Davies). Because of the interaction with the politician before and learning that New Eden might not be as benevolent as the government makes it out to be to its citizens, Kross decides to go rogue and try and save this mother and child from certain death from the government that he had faithfully served for years. 

This movie is a victim of its own ambition. The various locations that the trio travel to are only identified as being located in a war-ravaged area by being vacant of any people in a desert-like location. But beneath the very poor set design and direction is a script that tries to expose the humanity of a very plausible, at the time (2018), future of America based upon the fears and anxieties present in the country fomenting for decades. The future government that rules this new country is a mix of the fears of both liberal and conservative ideologies in America - it is a corporate-like fascist country that has placed the value of its citizens onto their own abilities to provide value to society. By way of analogy, Humanity Bureau is a less-developed and less thoughtful Minority Report. I don't like to compare movies to one another very often, but it is difficult to avoid the comparison when an iterative product does not accomplish what a similar product has done before. Humanity Bureau fails to introduce the audience what the main concern to the protagonist is in the way that similar movies do. This may be a strong twist if it wasn't already clear that New Eden is a location where individuals are killed so that society can preserve its resources for the "more productive" or "more efficient". The only clarity that is obtained at the reveal of the twist is that New Eden is in fact a real place, but it is a death camp patterned after Nazi activities during WWII. The tension that is felt during the movie from Cage's Kross is him not wanting to tell this family the true nature of the settlement. By the time it is made clear why the tension exists, I felt beaten down, suffering through the slightly better than Birdemic: Shock and Terror quality computer graphics and set design. 

I frankly was exhausted to care by the end of the movie as to its conclusion because of all of these factors coming into concert. As I had said above, there is a human story that wants to be told at the heart of the movie, but it fails to break out of the limitations of its own budget and scope. I can see the appeal of telling the story of a post-apocalyptic America and an Edenic Canada in the context of an United States that is going through an existential leadership crisis. The movie would have suffered even more if the script aged even further and lost its relevance before it could attain the budget and talent needed to bring it to life. Cage's Kross is a fairly sympathetic character throughout the movie, but the other factors involved wore me down and I eventually stopped caring before the end of the movie came to pass. I would understand watching this movie as a matter of completeness, much as I am doing now, but I would not recommend my worst enemy to expose themselves to this product.

Face/Off (1997) - Review

Face/Off is a 1997 action film directed by legendary director John Woo starring Nicolas Cage and John Travolta as the dueling antagonists Castor Troy and Sean Archer, respectively. After a personal manhunt following the murder of his son, FBI special agent Sean Archer finally nabs international criminal extraordinaire Castor Troy, a man on Archer's radar far before his involvement in the aforementioned killing. Archer is tasked with going undercover as Troy as the FBI is made aware that there is a lingering bomb threat for the city of Los Angeles from Troy that he cannot be any assistance in solving; Archer undergoes a revolutionary plastic surgery and voice modulation to assume the identity of a comatose Castor Troy to ferret the necessary information out of Troy's coconspirators. Unfortunately for Archer, Troy wakes from his coma during this mission and violently assumes the identity of Archer through the same surgery process. The two men continue their feud, now with their roles reversed; the prey has now become the hunter, and vice versa.

Face/Off has always been my favorite Nic Cage movie, if not one of my favorite movies of all time. Each line and visual cue is packed with symbolism that is all addressed by the conclusion of the film. This might seem very concerning knowing that the runtime is just over two hours, but every minute is active. Any second that could have been wasted is left on the cutting room floor, which serves to keep the audience's attention. The setting shows the limits of its timelessness, with the only thing taking me out of the suspension of disbelief I usually try hard to suspend myself being the technology systems that the director and producers thought was so cutting edge, if not trying to forecast what unrealized technology might look like. Otherwise, the story never failed to keep me enthralled each and every scene. I would be remiss to wait any longer to discuss the performances of not only Cage and Travolta, but everyone else as well. The conceit of the actors having to swap each other's characters; trying to figure out how Cage would portray Travolta's Archer trying to mimic Cage's Castor Troy and vice versa is such a monumental feat of acting that actors without distinct personalities and tics would have a difficult time achieving. The range of acting that they would also have to engage with is also a monumental task. It is not only an achievement to cast two actors who each have unique personas, but that those actors can emulate each other is the other side of that monumental accomplishment. The performances of everyone else involved is equally astonishing, having to inhabit their characters enough to show the appropriate confusion by the incongruities that happen after the main switch occurs.

I watched this with my wife and one of my oldest friends. Usually I would have to fight to maintain my wife's attention during a Nic Cage movie, but this film captured her attention once she realized that the high status I attributed earlier in this review was not just a flippant statement. We all had a good time watching this movie, especially when I realized that I was to write a review for this project. I highly recommend that anyone interested in the body of work of Nic Cage would go out and watch this film, if not own it for your own personal collection. You still get the crazy Nic Cage that some of us have come to expect and enjoy, but you also have the zaniness of John Travolta shining through. All of that wrapped in a highly stylized packaged that can only be presented by John Woo.